1st Session, 40th Legislature
This version is based on the printed bill that was distributed in the Legislature after First Reading. It is not the official version. If accuracy is critical, you can obtain a copy of the printed bill from Statutory Publications or view the online bilingual version (PDF).
THE HUMAN RIGHTS CODE AMENDMENT ACT
|Explanatory Note||Bilingual version (PDF)|
(Assented to )
HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba, enacts as follows:
Section 1 is amended
(a) by repealing the definition "dog guide"; and
(b) by adding the following definitions:
"chief adjudicator" means the person designated as chief adjudicator under subsection 8(1.1); (« arbitre en chef »)
"service animal" means an animal that has been trained to provide assistance to a person with a disability that relates to that person's disability; (« animal d'assistance »)
"social disadvantage" means diminished social standing or social regard due to
(a) homelessness or inadequate housing;
(b) low levels of education;
(c) chronic low income; or
The following is added after section 3:
The following is added after subsection 8(1):
The following is added after subsection 8(3):
Unless terminated for cause under subsection (4), a member of the adjudication panel who has commenced a hearing into a complaint may continue as adjudicator and issue a final decision on the complaint even if his or her appointment has expired and a replacement has been named.
The following is added after subsection 9(1):
In this Code, "discrimination" includes any act or omission that results in discrimination within the meaning of subsection (1), regardless of
(a) the form of the act or omission; and
Subsection 9(2) is amended
(a) in clause (f), by adding "sex-determined characteristics or circumstances, such as" after "sex, including";
(b) by replacing clause (g) with the following:
(g) gender identity;
(c) in clause (l), by striking out "dog guide or other animal assistant" and substituting "service animal"; and
(d) by adding the following after clause (l):
The following is added after subsection 9(2):
Subsection 9(3) is replaced with the following:
Interrelated actions, policies or procedures of a person that do not have a discriminatory effect when considered individually can constitute discrimination under this Code if the combined operation of those actions, policies or procedures results in discrimination within the meaning of subsection (1).
The following is added after section 24:
The Commission may attempt to resolve a complaint through mediation, conciliation or other means at any time.
If a complaint is settled on terms satisfactory to the complainant and respondent, the Commission must terminate its proceedings in respect of the complaint in accordance with the settlement.
Despite subsection (2), if the Commission determines that either party to the settlement has failed to substantially comply with the settlement terms, it may, after giving written notice to the parties, re-open the proceedings and proceed as if no settlement had been reached.
If a complainant rejects a settlement offer made by the respondent before an adjudicator is appointed to hear the complaint, the Commission must terminate its proceedings in respect of the complaint if the Commission considers the offer to be reasonable.
If a person contacts the Commission with a concern about the conduct of another person that could constitute a contravention of the Code, the Commission may try to assist them in reaching a mutually acceptable resolution of the concern before a complaint about the conduct is filed.
The following is added after section 28:
The chairperson may designate any three or more members of the Commission to sit as a panel of the Commission to consider a complaint.
A panel designated under subsection (1) may include the chairperson.
When considering a complaint,
(a) a panel has all the jurisdiction of the Commission and may exercise the Commission's powers and perform its duties; and
Subsection 29(3) is amended
(a) in the part before clause (a), by striking out everything before "and the Commission is satisfied" and substituting "If a complaint is not settled, terminated or dismissed"; and
The following is added after subsection 29(3):
If the Commission is satisfied that two or more complaints involve substantially similar issues of fact and law, it may do one or both of the following:
(a) deal with the complaints together under this section;
Subsection 29(4) is replaced with the following:
Subsection 32(1) is amended
(a) by striking out "under clause 29(3)(a), the minister" and substituting "under clause 29(3)(a) or (3.1)(b), the chief adjudicator"; and
The following is added after subsection 32(1):
When a request is made under clause 29(3.1)(b), the chief adjudicator may designate an adjudicator to hold a single hearing into the complaints if the chief adjudicator is satisfied that a single hearing will not result in unnecessary complications or delay or cause undue prejudice to a party.
Subsection 32(2) is amended
(a) by striking out "The minister" and substituting "The chief adjudicator";
(b) by adding "or (3.1)(b)" after "clause 29(3)(a)"; and
The following is added after section 37:
If a complainant rejects a settlement offer made by the respondent after an adjudicator is appointed to hear the complaint, the adjudicator must terminate the adjudication if he or she considers the offer to be reasonable.
Subsection 41(2) is amended
(a) by replacing the section heading with "Response to delay"; and
The following is added after subsection 41(7):
When the chief adjudicator is holding a hearing into a complaint and has failed to render a final decision within 60 days of the completion of the hearing, the minister may exercise any power given to the chief adjudicator under this section, including the power to designate a new adjudicator under section 32.
The following is added after subsection 43(1):
If an adjudicator determines that a party engaged in discrimination on the basis of more than one characteristic referred to in subsection 9(2), the adjudicator must consider the combined effect, if any, of that discrimination when making an order under subsection (2).
Subsection 46(2) is replaced with the following:
Subject to subsection (3), the Commission must make every decision, order and statement of reasons made by an adjudicator available to the public.
The adjudicator may direct the Commission to delete any information that would disclose the identity of a party or a witness at the hearing from a decision, order or statement of reasons made available to the public under subsection (2) if the adjudicator believes that the disclosure would cause undue prejudice or hardship to the party or witness.
The adjudicator must send the sound recordings of proceedings at the hearing, and all documents and materials filed at the hearing, to the Commission as soon as
(a) the deadline for applying for judicial review of the adjudicator's final decision under subsection 50(2) expires, if no application for judicial review is made by that deadline; or
Subsection 51(1) is amended
(a) in clause (e), by striking out "$2,000." and substituting "$5,000"; and
Subsection 51(4) is replaced with the following:
Section 52 is further amended by renumbering it as subsection 52(1) and adding the following as subsection 52(2):
When it is alleged that a person has engaged in discrimination on the basis of social disadvantage, the onus of proving that the discrimination is based on a negative bias or stereotype lies on the person making the allegation.
Section 62 is replaced with the following:
No action or proceeding may be brought against the Commission or any of its members, officers or employees, an adjudicator or any other person acting under the authority of this Code for anything done, or omitted to be done, in good faith, in the exercise or intended exercise of a power or duty under this Code.
The following is added after section 63:
The Commission may approve forms for use under this Code, including a form for complaints.
Despite the repeal of section 21 of the former Code, an advisory opinion given by the Commission remains in effect.
The Commission may revoke or modify an advisory opinion in accordance with subsection 21(3) of the former Code.
In this section, "former Code" means The Human Rights Code as it read immediately before this Act comes into force.
This Act comes into force on the day it receives royal assent.